Skip to content
Explore the interactive fictional MAT demonstration.Open the demo

Solutions

Operational areas, one coordinated system

Each area works on its own. Together they reduce the duplication of tracking connected work in different places.

  • Digital Leadership and Governance

    Trust IT directors, COOs and governance leads

    Digital responsibility is often shared between a trust IT lead, a school business manager and an external provider — with nobody holding the whole picture.

    Read more
  • Cybersecurity Coordination

    Trust IT directors and school IT leads

    Cyber risk is managed differently in every school, and the trust often learns about a gap only after an incident.

    Read more
  • Filtering and Monitoring Reviews

    Designated leads, IT leads and trust safeguarding governance

    Reviews are expected regularly, but the record of who checked what, when, and what they found is often thin.

    Read more
  • Technology Planning

    Trust IT directors, COOs and finance leads

    Device refresh, network upgrades and licensing decisions are made school by school, often without a shared plan or timeline.

    Read more
  • AI Governance

    Trust leaders, DPOs and school leadership

    Staff are already using AI tools. Very few trusts have a current, accurate register of which tools are in use and under what controls.

    Read more
  • Policy Management

    Governance leads, school business managers and trust central teams

    Policies are adopted at different times, in different versions, and acknowledgement is chased by email.

    Read more
  • Contract and Renewal Management

    COOs, finance leads and trust procurement

    Contracts auto-renew because a notice date passed unnoticed, and similar services are bought separately across schools.

    Read more
  • Risk and Action Management

    Trust central teams, school leaders and governance

    Risks are described inconsistently and actions live in meeting minutes rather than in a system anyone checks.

    Read more
  • School Improvement Coordination

    Trust school improvement teams and headteachers

    Improvement priorities are agreed in meetings and then tracked in a different document by every person involved.

    Read more
  • IT Service Delivery

    Trust IT teams and external IT providers

    IT teams are pulled between schools with no shared view of commitments, outstanding work or recurring issues.

    Read more
  • Trust-wide Reporting

    CEOs, COOs, trustees and governors

    Board reporting is assembled by hand each term, and the numbers rarely reconcile with what schools would say.

    Read more
  • Bring new schools into your trust with clarity.

    Growing trusts, COOs and central services

    Onboarding can span leadership, MIS, finance, HR, IT, policies, contracts, suppliers, data protection and reporting—without justifying premature system replacement.

    Read more
  • Understand the technology landscape across your trust.

    Trust operations, finance and technology leaders

    A trust may not know which schools use which systems, who owns them, what they cost, when contracts renew, what data they contain or where risk requires attention.

    Read more
  • Executive Intelligence

    CEOs, COOs and trust executive teams

    Executive teams assemble the trust-wide picture by hand, from several systems and many spreadsheets, and it is out of date by the time it is discussed.

    Read more
  • School Improvement Systems

    Directors of education, school improvement leads and headteachers

    Improvement priorities, visits, interventions and evidence are tracked in separate documents, so trust-wide themes are hard to see.

    Read more
  • Finance and Procurement Intelligence

    CFOs, finance business partners and procurement leads

    Budget position, procurement activity, supplier spend and contract renewals sit in different places, so consolidation opportunities are missed.

    Read more
  • People and Workforce Intelligence

    HR directors, COOs and headteachers

    Vacancies, agency usage, absence trends and training are held across HR, payroll and local spreadsheets, so workforce planning is reactive.

    Read more
  • Operational Management

    COOs, central services and school business professionals

    Central service requests, recurring checks, policies and operational actions are handled differently in each school and tracked in inboxes.

    Read more
  • Estates and Sustainability

    Estates directors, COOs and site teams

    Condition information, statutory checks, contractor records and energy data are held per site, making trust-wide prioritisation difficult.

    Read more
  • Governance and Assurance

    Governance professionals, trustees and executive teams

    Board papers are assembled by hand, assurance is asserted rather than evidenced, and decisions are recorded in minutes nobody searches.

    Read more
  • Contracts and Supplier Management

    COOs, CFOs and procurement leads

    Contracts sit in different folders, notice dates pass unnoticed and similar services are held with several suppliers across the trust.

    Read more
  • AI Readiness

    Trust executives, IT and data directors and governance leads

    Staff are already using AI tools, expectations are rising, and few trusts have an agreed, evidenced position on where AI is appropriate.

    Read more
  • Custom Management Reporting

    Executives, trustees and central teams

    Reports are rebuilt each cycle in spreadsheets, the numbers rarely reconcile, and nobody can see where a figure came from.

    Read more
  • Disconnected Systems and Spreadsheet Dependency

    IT and data directors, COOs and central teams

    The trust has plenty of systems. The work falls into the gaps between them, and spreadsheets fill those gaps.

    Read more

Could your trust operate with greater clarity?

Book a discovery call to talk through how your trust currently coordinates operational work — or explore the fictional demonstration first.