Trust leaders, DPOs and school leadership
AI Governance
Staff are already using AI tools. Very few trusts have a current, accurate register of which tools are in use and under what controls.
How the platform approaches it
- 1Maintain an AI product register per school and trust-wide.
- 2Record the approval decision, the controls and the reviewer.
- 3Review approvals on a schedule.
- 4Make the register visible to leaders and governors.
Capabilities used
- AI product register
- Approval status and decision record
- Documented controls and restrictions
- Named responsible owner
- Scheduled re-review
- Trust-wide AI usage view
Intended outcomes
Design goals for the platform, not measured results from real schools.
- An honest picture of AI use
- Decisions that are recorded rather than remembered
- A basis for staff guidance
The register supports governance. It does not assess legal or data protection compliance of third-party AI tools.
Related areas
Digital Leadership and Governance
Digital responsibility is often shared between a trust IT lead, a school business manager and an external provider — with nobody holding the whole picture.
Read moreCybersecurity Coordination
Cyber risk is managed differently in every school, and the trust often learns about a gap only after an incident.
Read moreFiltering and Monitoring Reviews
Reviews are expected regularly, but the record of who checked what, when, and what they found is often thin.
Read more
Could your trust operate with greater clarity?
Book a discovery call to talk through how your trust currently coordinates operational work — or explore the fictional demonstration first.